Index
- November 2024 5
- October 2024 2
- August 2024 3
- July 2024 2
- June 2024 4
- May 2024 1
- April 2024 5
- March 2024 5
- February 2024 4
- January 2024 2
- December 2023 5
- November 2023 7
- October 2023 4
- September 2023 5
- August 2023 3
- July 2023 5
- June 2023 3
- May 2023 5
- April 2023 3
- March 2023 5
- February 2023 9
- December 2022 9
- November 2022 3
- October 2022 7
- September 2022 4
- August 2022 8
- July 2022 3
- June 2022 4
- May 2022 9
- April 2022 7
- March 2022 2
- February 2022 5
- December 2021 7
- November 2021 12
- October 2021 9
- September 2021 14
- August 2021 9
- July 2021 5
- June 2021 9
- May 2021 4
- April 2021 3
- March 2021 13
- February 2021 7
- December 2020 1
- November 2020 4
- October 2020 4
- September 2020 5
- August 2020 5
- July 2020 8
- June 2020 5
- May 2020 11
- April 2020 6
- March 2020 5
- February 2020 3
- January 2020 1
- December 2019 1
- November 2019 3
- October 2019 2
- September 2019 2
- August 2019 4
- July 2019 2
- June 2019 2
- May 2019 5
- April 2019 8
- March 2019 2
- February 2019 3
- December 2018 1
- November 2018 9
- October 2018 2
- September 2018 5
- August 2018 3
- July 2018 3
- June 2018 2
- May 2018 5
- April 2018 7
- March 2018 3
- February 2018 4
- December 2017 3
- November 2017 7
- October 2017 4
- September 2017 3
- August 2017 3
- July 2017 1
- June 2017 3
- May 2017 2
- April 2017 3
- March 2017 4
- February 2017 3
- January 2017 1
- December 2016 3
- November 2016 4
- October 2016 2
- September 2016 1
- August 2016 3
- July 2016 1
- June 2016 3
- May 2016 3
- April 2016 4
- March 2016 4
- February 2016 3
- January 2016 1
- December 2015 2
- November 2015 4
- October 2015 4
- September 2015 4
- August 2015 3
- July 2015 6
- June 2015 6
Public Law Events Roundup April 2022
Welcome to the April edition of the AUSPUBLAW Australian Public Law Events Roundup.
Campbell v Northern Territory – The Lingering Uncertainty over Comparators and Comparisons in the Racial Discrimination Act
Alan Zheng
Note: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains the names of people who have passed away.
Over the past decade, the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RDA) has found its place as a remedial avenue for First Nations persons and communities seeking justice against unlawful racial discrimination.
Public Law Events Roundup March 2022
Welcome to the March edition of the AUSPUBLAW Australian Public Law Events Roundup.
To Kill The Queen’s Enemies (And Keep the Peace As Well)
Samuel White
In January 2020, the Prime Minister of Australia announced that the Australian Defence Force (ADF) would move from ‘respond to request’ to ‘move forward and integrate’, signalling increased domestic deployments in response to the devastating bushfires over the summer of 2019/2020. Two months later, Operation COVID-19 Assist was established and constituted the largest deployment – domestic or external - of the ADF since World War Two.
The Devil is in the Detail: The Reserve Powers under the Australian Choice Model
Dane Luo
Last month, the Australian Republic Movement (ARM) published the Australian Choice Model – a model for a Australian republic where the Head of State would be elected by the Australian people every five years from a pool of candidates nominated by the Commonwealth, state and territory Parliaments.
Tidying our house of law: bringing the Marie Kondo philosophy to the Commonwealth statute book
William Isdale and Nicholas Simoes da Silva
Last year marked the 120th anniversary of the Commonwealth statute book – an anniversary that offers an opportunity to reflect on the house of law we have built. There is much to be proud of: a house constructed from the timbers of Parliamentary sovereignty, with strong constitutional foundations.
Time to modernise: The future of constitutional review and referendums in Australia
Paul Kildea
On 20 December 2021, the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs completed its inquiry into constitutional reform and referendums and published an anticipated Report. The Report makes 10 recommendations …
A principled approach to key reforms of Australia's administrative review system
Gabrielle Appleby, Lynsey Blayden, Chantal Bostock & Janina Boughey
In the final post for the Kerr Report series, which examines whether Australian administrative law is still fit for purpose 50 years after the Kerr Committee Report, we reflect on a number of key reforms required to ensure the performance and integrity of Australia’s administrative review system. …
Alienage and Citizenship after Chetcuti v Commonwealth
Guy Baldwin
Since the shift in focus for supporting Commonwealth migration legislation from the ‘immigration’ power under s 51(xxvii) of the Constitution to the ‘aliens’ power under s 51(xix) in the 1980s, there has been a great deal of litigation before the High Court about the scope of s 51(xix). Perhaps the most influential judicial dicta …
An Intangible Way Forward: The Juukan Gorge Inquiry and the Future of First Nations Heritage Law in Australia
Lucas Lixinski
In mid-October 2021, the Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia delivered ‘A Way Forward: Final report into the destruction of Indigenous heritage sites at Juukan Gorge’ (‘A Way Forward’, or ‘Report’). This Report makes recommendations to change Australian law to better safeguard First Nations identities and …
Western Australia after the Juukan Gorge Inquiry: Little solace for Aboriginal people
Hannah McGlade
The Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia’s Inquiry into the destruction of Indigenous heritage sites at Juukan Gorge reported in October. Its report, ‘A Way Forward’ called for a new national framework of Aboriginal heritage protection co-designed with Aboriginal people. It recommended that the responsibility for Aboriginal cultural heritage, sitting …
The Australia's Foreign Relations Act and the international dealings of state and territory governments
Georgie Clough
On 21 April 2021, the Commonwealth Minister for Foreign Affairs (the Minister) announced the cancellation of two memoranda of understanding between the Victorian state government and the Chinese government with respect to the latter’s Belt and Road Initiative (the Belt and Road agreements). The power to cancel the agreements …
Can Clive Palmer use Investor-State Dispute Settlement to get what the High Court wouldn't give him?
Jonathan Bonnitcha
The High Court’s decisions in Mineralogy v WA and Palmer v WA end the dispute between Mineralogy/Clive Palmer and the Western Australian government as a matter of Australian law. It is not, however, the end of the dispute. A Singaporean-incorporated entity in Palmer’s corporate group is now poised to commence international arbitration. …
Manner and form mysteries highlighted but unresolved in Mineralogy v WA
Anne Twomey
One of the difficulties in understanding and applying manner and form constraints on state legislative power is that there is little jurisprudence on the subject and what exists is often unclear, poorly reasoned and in some cases just wrong. That is why the manner and form arguments in Mineralogy …
The Kerr Report, 50 Years On: An Overseas Overview
Paul Daly
Before situating the Kerr Report in what I consider to be its historical context, let me begin with a quibble. The Kerr Report considered comparative materials in some detail. This must have taken considerable effort in days where information from the United States, the United Kingdom, New Zealand …
Re-enacting ‘plainly wrong’ interpretations - a divided High Court in Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 of 2019 [2021] HCA 26
Joseph McDonald
On 1 September 2021, the High Court handed down its judgment on a novel question of statutory interpretation in Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 1 [2021] HCA 26 (DPP Reference No 1). The question for the Full Court was the interpretation of s 17 of the Crimes Act 1958 ...
The High Court’s defence of Academic Freedom in Ridd v JCU
Joshua Forrest & Adrienne Stone
On 13 October 2021, the High Court handed down its decision in Ridd v James Cook University [2021] HCA 32. The decision concludes a bitter, long-running and unedifying legal dispute between James Cook University (JCU) and a former professor, Peter Ridd. It also usefully clarifies the status, content …