Month: November 2017

Senator Paterson’s Same Sex Marriage Bill: Incompatible with International Human Rights

BY ANJA HILKEMEIJER

 

Two days before the release of the result of the Same Sex Marriage Survey, Liberal Senator James Paterson made public a Bill that would allow anyone who has a strong belief in ‘traditional marriage’ to refuse … Read the rest

Council Amalgamations in NSW: A Study in How Not to Tackle Hard Policy

BY LYNSEY BLAYDEN

On 27 July 2017, after an 18-month long battle fought on various fronts, including through the courts, the NSW Premier, the Hon Gladys Berejiklian, announced that the government would not proceed with all remaining proposed amalgamations of … Read the rest

Justice Edelman’s originalism, or hints of it

BY JULIAN R MURPHY

 

Justice Edelman has only been on the High Court for a matter of months but he has already sat on a number of significant constitutional cases, and there are more on the horizon. The newest … Read the rest

The trajectory of structured proportionality in implied freedom of political communication cases: Brown v Tasmania

  BY SHIPRA CHORDIA

On 18 October, the High Court handed down its judgment in Brown v Tasmania [2017] HCA 43.  The plaintiffs – Dr Bob Brown and Ms Jessica Hoyt – successfully argued that certain provisions of the Workplaces Read the rest

The Right to Protest after Brown v Tasmania

BY JOHN ELDRIDGE AND TIM MATTHEWS

The common law has historically been hostile to the importance of public protest. Indeed, A V Dicey, in his seminal An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, was categorical … Read the rest

Public Law Events Roundup November 2017

Welcome to the November edition of the AUSPUBLAW Australian Public Law Events Roundup. A big thank you once again to the Gilbert + Tobin Centre of Public Law’s social justice intern, Aaron Taverniti, for compiling this roundup.

In addition to … Read the rest

© 2017 AUSPUBLAW

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑